Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42699403›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Enhancing medical care for aniridia through a public health lens: a scoping review of organizational models, patient management, and quality of life assessment.

Marfuga Oteuliyeva, Dastan Kyrykbayev, Gulnar Zhurgumbayeva, Dariga Smailova, Islam Ordabayev, Luca Brusati

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marfuga OteuliyevaKazakh Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Dastan KyrykbayevKazakh Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Gulnar ZhurgumbayevaKazakh Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Dariga SmailovaKazakh National Medical University named after S.D. Asfendiyarov, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Islam OrdabayevKazakh Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Luca BrusatiUniversità degli Studi di Udine Biblioteca Scientifica e Tecnologica, Udine, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Congenital aniridia is a rare disorder characterized by partial or complete absence of the iris and is usually associated with other ocular and systemic complications. Its lifelong and multisystem nature creates challenges that extend beyond clinical management and require coordinated, multidisciplinary, and equitable healthcare delivery. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for English-language publications from January 2015 to May 2025 addressing organizational models of care, patient-management strategies, and quality-of-life assessment in congenital aniridia. Included sources were descriptively classified by study design and evidence category. Findings were synthesized using a combined deductive and inductive thematic approach. Results: Fourteen sources met the inclusion criteria and represented different geographical and healthcare settings. The evidence was predominantly observational, retrospective, descriptive, or based on expert and organizational recommendations. Across the reviewed literature, recurrent themes included multidisciplinary coordination, access to specialized expertise, structured referral pathways, registries, telemedicine, lifelong monitoring, genetic counseling, rehabilitation, and patient support. However, direct comparative and longitudinal evaluations of organizational models were lacking. Quality-of-life studies used heterogeneous assessment instruments, limiting direct comparison, although poorer visual function, advanced ocular complications, ocular pain, and broader psychological or systemic burden were generally associated with less favorable patient-reported outcomes. Conclusion: The available evidence supports the principles of lifelong, multidisciplinary, coordinated, and patient-centered care for congenital aniridia. Future health-system development may benefit from strengthened centers of expertise, standardized referral pathways, registry infrastructure, digital consultation, and improved access to specialized services. Prospective multicentre and longitudinal studies are needed to determine the comparative effectiveness of different organizational models and to standardize patient-reported outcome assessment.

Indexed as

AniridiaDelivery of Health CareModels, OrganizationalPublic HealthQuality of LifeHumansaniridiahealth equityinterdisciplinary carepatient-centered carepublic healthquality of liferare diseasessocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID42699403
PMCPMC13543156

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.