ReviewCureus2026
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Diagnostic Performance of AI Systems for Medical Imaging in the United States: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AI-assisted diagnostic systems are increasingly being integrated into radiology and medical imaging practice in the United States. Concerns have emerged regarding differences in diagnostic performance across racial and ethnic populations, particularly among historically underserved groups. This study aimed to systematically review evidence on racial and ethnic disparities in the diagnostic performance of AI systems used in radiology and medical imaging in the United States. A systematic search of major databases identified 27 eligible studies published between 2015 and 2026. The included studies primarily consisted of retrospective observational and validation studies evaluating AI systems in chest radiography, breast ultrasound, and ophthalmologic imaging, as well as selected non-imaging predictive models. Several studies reported reduced diagnostic performance, lower sensitivity, higher rates of underdiagnosis, or subgroup disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations, particularly Black and Hispanic patients. Some studies also demonstrated that fairness-aware model development and subgroup validation may improve equity in AI performance. The findings were synthesized narratively and support the need for diverse training datasets, transparent demographic reporting, standardized fairness evaluations, and prospective multicenter validation before the widespread clinical implementation of AI systems in radiology and medical imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.