ReviewCureus2026
A Narrative Review of Airway and Gut Microbiota in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Clinical Associations, Methodological Heterogeneity, and Translational Priorities.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disorder in which exacerbation susceptibility, persistent inflammation, disease progression, and treatment response are not fully explained by spirometry. Culture-independent studies have associated airway and gut microbial features with clinically relevant COPD phenotypes, but findings are highly sensitive to sampling site, low biomass, contamination control, sequencing depth and platform, bioinformatic workflow, microbial-load quantification, medication exposure, disease state, and host or environmental confounding. Methodological and clinical heterogeneity is therefore a central explanation for inconsistent results. This narrative review, a non-systematic synthesis using a prespecified focused PubMed/MEDLINE search (1 August 2021-1 August 2026), English-language eligibility, single-reviewer selection, structured data charting, and thematic appraisal without formal study-level risk-of-bias grading, evaluates recent human evidence on the airway bacteriome and mycobiome, gut microbiota and metabolites, host-microbe relationships, and the ecological effects of antibiotics and inhaled corticosteroids. Across cohorts, lower airway diversity, states dominated by potential pathobionts (normally resident organisms that may contribute to disease under altered host or ecological conditions), and altered microbial networks are recurrent but not universal associations; no disease-specific taxonomic signature has been validated. Gut microbial and metabolic differences may represent causes, consequences, treatment effects, shared determinants, or combinations of these mechanisms. Relative abundance is difficult to interpret without absolute microbial-load measurement. No microbiota-based diagnostic test, prognostic classifier, or intervention is ready for routine COPD care. Progress requires standardized longitudinal sampling, rigorous controls, absolute quantification, paired airway-gut multi-omics, diverse external validation, and randomized trials with prespecified patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.