ArticleEye (London, England)2026
Health seeking behaviours of those accessing primary Eye care services in Tamil Nadu, India.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to understand the health-seeking behaviours of individuals attending primary vision centres (VCs) operated by Sankara Eye Hospital in Tamil Nadu, India, to inform service provision.
methodsA mixed-methods study was conducted with 158 patients attending seven VCs across three districts over three weeks. Quantitative data included demographic, clinical, and travel-related variables, visual acuity and primary diagnosis. Additionally, 53 patients participated in semi-structured interviews exploring perceptions of eye health and factors influencing attendance. Quantitative data were analysed for associations, with exploratory multivariable analyses for key outcomes, while qualitative data underwent inductive thematic analysis.
resultsWomen were significantly more likely to attend with a companion (p < 0.001), and this association remained after adjustment for age and education. Older age was associated with paying for transport in univariable analysis but not after adjustment, while lower educational attainment remained associated in multivariable analysis. Qualitative findings identified barriers and motivators to attendance, sources of eye health knowledge, and strategies to improve utilisation.
conclusionPatients often assumed costs and delayed attendance until daily activities were affected. While eye health was valued, recommendations from friends/family were a key driver of attendance. These findings highlight the role of social influence and socioeconomic factors in shaping access to primary eye care. An important area for future research is to explore why women are more likely to attend with a companion, and whether there is a correlation between age and the cost of travel to a VC.
Identifiers
42701128What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.