ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026
Dupilumab for Drug-Induced Bullous Pemphigoid: A Case Series and Literature Review.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-induced bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an increasingly recognized variant of BP with unique challenges in management, particularly when patients require continuation of the offending medication or are contraindicated to conventional immunosuppressive therapies. We report 4 patients with drug-induced BP, three associated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and one with immune checkpoint inhibitor, successfully treated with dupilumab. All four patients had failed or were intolerant to conventional therapies. Following dupilumab initiation, all patients experienced significant improvement in pruritus within 2 weeks. Complete remission was achieved in 3 patients within 1-5 months of treatment and one patient had stable disease, enabling him to resume pembrolizumab therapy for esophageal cancer while on dupilumab. No significant adverse effects were reported during treatment periods. Our findings, supported by a literature review, suggest that dupilumab demonstrates promising efficacy and safety in treating drug-induced BP, with rapid improvement in pruritus and resolution of skin lesions. It may offer a valuable therapeutic alternative as a steroid sparing agent for elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and provides the potential to continue necessary medications (eg, cancer therapy) that may have triggered BP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.