ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2026
Shining a light on brain tumors: a review of Raman spectroscopy in the operating room.
Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The relationship between thanatophobia and perceptions of spirituality and spiritual care among intensive care nurses.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Maximizing brain tumor resection while preserving neurological function remains a neurosurgical challenge. Current intraoperative tools, including MRI, ultrasound, and frozen section, disrupt workflow and provide limited real-time molecular information. Aim: This review synthesizes evidence for Raman spectroscopy as an intraoperative tool in glioma and brain metastasis surgery, comparing it against established alternatives and framing findings within a diagnostic hierarchy from analytic validity through clinical utility to outcome benefit. Approach: Evidence is arranged by surgical setting: Results: Conclusions: While multicenter studies support the analytic validity of Raman-based tissue detection, clinical adoption requires prospective outcome trials, standardized acquisition protocols, and regulatory advancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.