ArticleCardiovascular toxicology2026
QT Prolongation, Ventricular Arrhythmia, and Cardiac Arrest Signals During Ceftriaxone Co-therapy with Individual Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Multidatabase Study.
Article in Cardiovascular toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The concomitant use of ceftriaxone and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is common in hospital practice. However, it is unclear whether individual PPIs differ in their effects on QT interval prolongation, ventricular arrhythmia, or cardiac arrest, collectively termed as QVC events. We conducted a two-stage, real-world study. First, we screened the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction (CVAR) database with standard disproportionality measures (reporting odds ratio and proportional reporting ratio) and six drug-drug interaction (DDI) algorithms to identify combination signals that exceeded component signals. Second, we validated signal-positive combinations in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) intensive care unit (ICU) electronic health record (EHR) cohort by assembling adult inpatients with overlapping ceftriaxone-PPI exposures. The primary outcome was 28-day QVC events. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were the main analysis and complemented by propensity score matching, inverse probability of treatment weighting, and Fine-Gray competing-risk models. To address external generalisability, an additional validation was performed using ECG-ViEW II, an Asian electrocardiogram-linked real-world database. The combination of ceftriaxone and lansoprazole was significantly associated with QVC events, revealing notable DDIs (e.g., in FAERS, Ω025 = 0.54). To validate these findings, a cohort of 5,594 patients receiving ceftriaxone combined with PPIs from the MIMIC-IV database was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. The analyses corroborated the initial findings (lansoprazole vs. other PPIs, multivariate HR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.10-1.54), with the risk associated with the three PPI combinations ranked as lansoprazole > pantoprazole > omeprazole. ECG-ViEW II provided supportive Asian external validation, showing a higher QVC risk for ceftriaxone plus lansoprazole than for ceftriaxone plus other PPIs. Evidence from two national pharmacovigilance systems and an ICU EHR cohort indicated that PPI choice modified cardiac safety during ceftriaxone therapy. Lansoprazole co-use confers a higher risk of QVC, whereas omeprazole appears relatively safer. Therefore, prospective confirmation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.