SynthesisJournal of neurology2026
Prion disease mimicking rapidly progressive Alzheimer disease: case series and systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrion disease and Alzheimer disease (AD) are common causes of rapidly progressive dementia (RPD). Although most patients with prion disease are distinguished by MRI and CSF findings, selected cases mimic rapidly progressive AD. We characterized AD-prion disease mimics within a prospective cohort and the extant literature to identify the clinical features and tests that support accurate diagnoses in these patients.
methodsPatients with prion disease initially diagnosed as rapidly progressive AD were identified from a prospective cohort study at Mayo Clinic (February 2020-June 2026) and through systematic review of MEDLINE and Embase.
resultsOf 204 patients with RPD, five (2.5%) were initially diagnosed with clinically probable AD but ultimately determined to have prion disease. Systematic review identified 10 additional cases (n=15, median age-at-onset, 59 years; 67% male). Presentations reproduced amnestic (53%), dysexecutive (27%), primary progressive aphasia (13%), and posterior cortical atrophy (7%) AD phenotypes; median time from AD diagnosis to consideration of prion disease was 2 months. Diffusion-weighted MRI abnormalities were absent in Mayo Clinic cases and absent/equivocal (n=2) or overlooked (n=8) in published cases. CSF biomarkers were consistent with AD in 6/9 tested patients, with elevated total tau levels in 11/13 patients and total-tau/p hosphorylated-tau181 ratios in 5/9 patients. Real-time quaking-induced conversion assays for prions were positive in the CSF of 9/12 patients. Prion disease was confirmed by neuropathology (n=7), genetics (n=2), or real-time quaking-induced conversion (n=6) assays.
conclusionsPrion disease may rarely mimic rapidly progressive AD. Disproportionate elevations in CSF total-tau levels or total-tau/p hosphorylated-tau181 ratios should prompt consideration of prion disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.