ArticleMethodsX2026
Linking decedents and their family members to study multiple end-of-life outcomes in various settings from a population registry.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rigorous empirical end-of-life studies of decedents and families can help healthcare practitioners provide optimal healthcare experiences. Such studies are increasingly important as populations age, placing increasing caregiving loads on patients' families. But patient family data are difficult and expensive to obtain through traditional survey methods. Population registries can complement other research methodologies by permitting large numbers of study subjects and linking family members to decedents. From the Utah Population Database, we formed the Utah Caregiving Population Sciences (C-PopS) cohort, a detailed data registry of Utah adults who died of natural causes between 1998-2016 and their first-degree Utah-residing family members, including key demographic data and health records two years before and after death. Organizing data tables at distinct levels permitted efficient data utilization by researchers with different skills and expertise. The resulting scalable infrastructure included a cohort of 217,222 Utah decedents and 744,368 decedent kin pairs; and enabled production of multiple end-of-life studies for many different health outcomes in various healthcare settings.•An end-of-life decedent-family population registry can facilitate studies that are not otherwise feasible.•Data controls ensure reliability, validity, and ethical compliance.•Distinct levels of decedent-family data tables permit scalable production of multiple end-of-life studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.