Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42706420›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2026

Cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: 25 years of progress, remaining challenges and future directions.

Massimiliano Calabrese, Roberta Magliozzi, Agnese Tamanti, Stefano Ziccardi, Chiara Eccher, Pietro Biasi, Francesca Benedetta Pizzini, Damiano Marastoni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Massimiliano CalabreseDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neurology B Section, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. massimiliano.calabrese@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3362-7403
Roberta MagliozziDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neurology B Section, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Agnese TamantiDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neurology B Section, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9972-4348
Stefano ZiccardiDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neurology B Section, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0426-7223
Chiara EccherDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neurology B Section, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8654-5360
Pietro BiasiDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neurology B Section, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Francesca Benedetta PizziniNeuroradiology, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Damiano MarastoniDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neurology B Section, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0358-9431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical lesions have evolved from a largely overlooked pathological feature to a central component of multiple sclerosis pathophysiology, yet their biology, clinical relevance and response to treatment remain incompletely understood. In this Review, we trace how pathological studies established the frequency and heterogeneity of cortical demyelination, with particular attention to subpial lesions and inflammation at the brain-cerebrospinal fluid interface. We examine the neuropathological and imaging evidence linking cortical pathology to meningeal inflammation, neuroaxonal injury and progression independent of relapse activity, and assess how emerging magnetic resonance imaging approaches for detecting and monitoring cortical lesions contribute to diagnosis and prognosis across the multiple sclerosis spectrum. Last, we discuss the sensitivity limits of imaging, the effects of disease-modifying therapies on this compartmentalized damage, and how quantitative magnetic resonance imaging, fluid biomarkers and artificial intelligence could help define biologically meaningful cortical endotypes and guide future therapeutic development.

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.