Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42706458›Full record

ReviewOral radiology2026

A narrative review of artificial intelligence in dental imaging: from dataset design to clinical translation.

Xinshui Zhang, Ji Yong Han, Jihye Heo, Jeongmin Ko, Won-Jin Yi, In-Seok Song

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinshui Zhang *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Ji Yong Han *Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jihye HeoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Jeongmin KoDepartment of Preventive & Public Health Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won-Jin YiInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. wjyi@snu.ac.kr.
In-Seok SongDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea. densis@korea.ac.kr.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea RS-2023-KH134676National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) 2023R1A2C200532611National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) RS-2026-25477630Technology Innovation Program (Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program - Advanced Biomaterials), funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) RS-2025-14322975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review the development pipeline of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental imaging, focusing on dataset design, annotation quality, model development, validation, and clinical translation. DATA: Published literature on AI applications in dental imaging, including machine learning, deep learning, and foundation-model-based approaches. SOURCES: Peer-reviewed studies addressing imaging modalities, dataset construction, annotation protocols, model architectures, performance evaluation, and clinical translation. STUDY SELECTION: Studies involving panoramic radiography, intraoral radiography, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and intraoral scanning were reviewed, with emphasis on dataset quality, annotation methodology, model evaluation, interpretability, and clinical implementation.

conclusionsAI has demonstrated considerable potential for automated classification, detection, segmentation, and decision support in dental imaging. However, challenges including dataset heterogeneity, annotation inconsistency, domain shift, information leakage, interpretability, and regulatory requirements continue to limit clinical adoption. Emerging approaches such as multimodal learning and foundation models may improve generalizability and clinical applicability. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This review highlights key methodological and translational considerations beyond algorithm performance, providing guidance for developing reliable and clinically meaningful AI systems in dental imaging.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiography, DentalDatasets as TopicHumansArtificial intelligenceClinical translationDeep learningDental imagingImage analysis

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.