ReviewEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2026
Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide Versus Dulaglutide in Type 2 Diabetes With or Without Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Review in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimThis network meta-analysis addresses the limited dose-specific comparative evidence by evaluating different doses of tirzepatide (TZP) versus dulaglutide (DULA) for glycemic control, weight loss, and safety in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
methodsFollowing PRISMA and Cochrane guidance, we searched major databases for RCTs comparing TZP and DULA in adults with T2DM. Efficacy outcomes included body weight change (Weeks 12 and 16) and mean HbA1c change (Weeks 12 and 24). Safety outcomes included mortality, cardiovascular events, and adverse events (AEs). SUCRA ranking was used and analysis performed in RStudio (v4.5.1).
resultsFour RCTs comprising 14,348 participants contributed to a seven-node network. However, Nicholls et al. 2025 had the majority of sample size (n = 13,165). TZP 15 mg achieved the greatest reduction in body weight at Week 16 (mean difference [MD] vs. TZP 5 mg: -2.68 kg; 95% CI -4.98 to -0.38), while TZP 1 mg (MD: 4.39 kg; 95% CI 1.28 to 7.51) and DULA 0.75 mg (MD: 3.10 kg; 95% CI 0.25 to 5.96) were associated with smaller reductions relative to TZP 5 mg. TZP 15 mg also produced the largest HbA1c reduction at Week 24 (MD vs. TZP 5 mg: -0.40%; 95% CI -0.62 to -0.19), compared with TZP 10 mg (MD: -0.23%; 95% CI -0.44 to -0.02) and DULA 1.5 mg (MD: 0.67%; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.09). No significant differences were observed between treatments for all-cause mortality or major cardiovascular events. Gastrointestinal AEs were more frequent with higher TZP doses, especially TZP 15 mg vs. TZP 5 mg for nausea, while serious AEs and severe hypoglycemia were similar across doses.
conclusionHigher TZP doses potentially improve efficacy, while lower TZP/DULA doses enhance tolerability, supporting individualized T2DM care. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because several comparisons are indirect, many participants had not reached their maintenance dose, several safety outcomes were based on limited event counts, and significant inconsistency was observed for early body-weight outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.