Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707071›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026

Multi-Institutional Proton Beam Therapy Outcomes for Hepatocellular Carcinoma From the Proton Collaborative Group REG001-09 Registry Study.

Michael D Chuong, Amanda Zakka, Robert A Herrera, Muni Rubens, Arpit Chhabra, Jason Molitoris, Jonathan Ashman, Nasir Mohammed, John Chang, James Urbanic and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01255748 (Evaluation Tracking Project), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01255748 recruitingnot on this map

Evaluation Tracking Project: A Prospective Chart Review of Patients Treated With Radiation Therapy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorProton Collaborative GroupRan2009Enrolled50,000ConditionsNeoplasmsArmsProton Therapy, Photon Therapy, SRS, Brachytherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michael D ChuongWertheim Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Amanda ZakkaWertheim Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Robert A HerreraWertheim Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Muni RubensWertheim Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Arpit ChhabraNew York Proton Center, New York, New York.
Jason MolitorisMaryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jonathan AshmanMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Nasir MohammedNorthwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
John ChangOklahoma Proton Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
James UrbanicCalifornia Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, California.
Henry TsaiProCure Proton Center, Somerset, New Jersey.
Michael EblanInova Mather Proton Therapy Center, Fairfax, Virginia.
Smith ApisarnthanaraxUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is commonly delivered with x-rays, although proton beam therapy (PBT) offers a unique dosimetric advantage that for some patients may translate into meaningful clinical benefit. Most published outcomes of PBT for HCC come from Asian institutions, whereas there is a scarcity of data from Western countries. Methods and Materials: We identified patients with nonmetastatic HCC patients treated with definitive PBT at 9 institutions in the United States and enrolled on the Proton Collaborative Group REG001-09 prospective registry study (NCT01255748). The primary study objective was to describe treatment efficacy and safety outcomes. Results: 88 patients were treated from 2013 to 2021. Median age was 68 years (range, 40-91) most with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 (85.0%). Median tumor size was 4.7 cm (range, 1.2-19 cm). Baseline Child-Pugh (CP) class was A or B in 43 (71.7%) and 15 (25.0%), respectively. The median prescribed biologically effective dose (BED Conclusions: Dose-escalated PBT, delivered predominantly with moderate hypofractionation, achieves excellent FFLF with a favorable safety profile. PBT may offer a particular clinical advantage for large HCC and prospective evaluation for this high-risk patient subset is warranted.

Identifiers

PMID42707071
PMCPMC13546901

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.