ArticleFrontiers in oral health2026
Efficacy and safety of intraseptal and periodontal ligament anaesthesia for extraction of upper lateral incisors and lower first premolars in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of local anesthetics with vasoconstrictors in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) requires particular caution because of possible cardiovascular effects and increased susceptibility of diabetic nerve fibers to ischemic injury. Intraseptal anaesthesia (ISA) and periodontal ligament anaesthesia (PLA) may represent effective alternatives to conventional local anaesthesia in diabetic patients. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety profiles of ISA and PLA administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLADS) for extraction of maxillary lateral incisors and mandibular first premolars in patients with controlled Type 2 DM. Materials and methods: A total of 120 patients with controlled Type 2 DM were randomly allocated into either the ISA ( Results: Immediate onset of anaesthesia was achieved in all successful cases. ISA demonstrated a higher success rate than PLA, particularly for extraction of mandibular first premolars, although the difference was not statistically significant. ISA provided significantly longer duration of soft tissue anaesthesia and significantly wider distribution of the anaesthetic field than PLA for both investigated teeth. Cardiovascular parameters remained generally stable throughout the observation period in both groups. anaesthesia in blood pressure and heart rate were observed during and after anesthetic administration, without clinically relevant hemodynamic alterations. Conclusion: Both ISA and PLA administered with CCLADS were safe and clinically effective anesthetic techniques in patients with controlled Type 2 DM, without clinically relevant cardiovascular alterations. The longer duration and wider distribution of soft tissue anaesthesia achieved with ISA may support its use as a reliable option for tooth extraction in diabetic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.