Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707467›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2026

Delirium in the oncology intensive care unit: Risk, recognition, and recovery strategies.

Prashant Sirohiya, Prateek Maurya, Nishkarsh Gupta, Saurabh Vig, Balbir Kumar, Brajesh Kumar Ratre, Raghav Gupta, Shweta Bhopale, Anuja Pandit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Prashant SirohiyaDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India. sirohiyaprashant@gmail.com.
Prateek MauryaDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Nishkarsh GuptaDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Saurabh VigDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Balbir KumarDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Brajesh Kumar RatreDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Raghav GuptaDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Shweta BhopaleDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.
Anuja PanditDepartment of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Institute, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delirium represents a severe neurological complication with exceptionally high prevalence in oncology intensive care units (ICU), affecting up to 88% of terminal cancer patients. This acute brain dysfunction emerges from the convergence of critical illness factors with cancer-specific vulnerabilities, creating unique management challenges. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on delirium epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic challenges, management strategies, and long-term cognitive outcomes specific to critically ill cancer patients. Delirium demonstrates a profound prognostic impact, increasing ICU mortality odds tenfold and hospital mortality sixfold. Patients experiencing delirium are nearly four times more likely to have cancer treatment modified or discontinued, directly affecting survival. Risk factors unique to this population include chemotherapy neurotoxicity, central nervous system malignancy, paraneoplastic syndromes, and complex medication regimens. While screening tools show strong performance in general ICU settings, validation in cancer populations remains limited. Evidence strongly supports non-pharmacologic multicomponent interventions over pharmacologic approaches, with early mobilization reducing delirium risk by 47%. Long-term cognitive impairment represents a devastating legacy, creating a double burden when superimposed on chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction. Management requires specialized preventive approaches prioritizing brain protection through systematic screening, multicomponent prevention bundles, and integrated palliative care.

Indexed as

Cancer critical careCancer survivorshipChemotherapy neurotoxicityCognitive dysfunctionDeliriumIntensive care unit outcomesNeurological complicationsOncology intensive care unitPalliative carePost-intensive care syndrome

Identifiers

PMID42707467
PMCPMC13548165

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.