ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2026
Biodegradable Polymer Ligatures and Auxiliaries in Orthodontics: An Empty Systematic Review.
Review in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Orthodontic ligatures and auxiliaries are essential components of fixed-appliance therapy. Conventional materials are nonbiodegradable and require periodic replacement, contributing to clinical inefficiency and environmental burden. Biodegradable polymer-based alternatives have been proposed as potential solutions. Objective: To systematically evaluate the available evidence on biodegradable polymer ligatures and auxiliaries in orthodontics, focusing on their mechanical properties, biodegradation behavior, and clinical applicability. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus databases from inception to January 2026. The review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies evaluating biodegradable polymer ligatures or orthodontic auxiliaries were included. The screening was performed independently by two reviewers. Results: A total of 149 records were identified. After removing one duplicate, 148 records were screened by title and abstract. Six studies were assessed for full-text eligibility; however, none of them met the inclusion criteria. The excluded full-text studies primarily involved conventional elastomeric ligatures, nonbiodegradable polymers, and materials lacking biodegradation properties. Conclusion: No studies have evaluated biodegradable polymer ligatures or auxiliaries in orthodontics. This highlights a significant research gap and underscores the need for the development and investigation of biodegradable orthodontic biomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.