ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Ineligible for Recanalization Therapies: A Phase II Trial.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04400981 (Multi-center Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial on Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 9 Hours of Onset in Patients Ineligible to Recanalization Therapies), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multi-center Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial on Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 9 Hours of Onset in Patients Ineligible to Recanalization Therapies
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRemote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has shown neuroprotective potential in preclinical stroke models. In patients with acute ischemic stroke, trials report heterogeneous results, supporting ongoing debate about clinical efficacy, especially in those ineligible for recanalization. This trial assessed RIC benefit in this population and evaluated HSP27 (heat shock protein 27) and HIF-1α (hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha) as biomarkers of RIC-related biological activity.
methodsThis was a multicenter, phase II, proof-of-concept, block-randomized, controlled, parallel-arm, PROBE (Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End Point)-designed clinical trial. Patients with acute ischemic stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score of 5-25) who were ineligible for recanalization therapies were randomized 1:1 within 9 hours of symptom onset to RIC (4 5-minute cycles of upper-arm ischemia/reperfusion) plus standard medical therapy or standard therapy alone. The primary outcome was the percentage change in NIHSS score at 72 hours. Secondary outcomes included NIHSS score changes at 24 and 48 hours, 90-day modified Rankin Scale, tolerability, and changes in plasma HSP27 and HIF-1α concentrations from 24 to 72 hours.
resultsEighty patients (40 per group) were enrolled across 4 centers from August 2021 to March 2024. Although slightly in favor of RIC treatment, median NIHSS score percentage change at 72 hours did not differ between the RIC and control groups (23.6% versus 29.9%; adjusted coefficient, -3.8 [95% CI, -19.7 to 12.1];
conclusionsIn patients with acute ischemic stroke ineligible for recanalization therapies, early RIC was safe, feasible, and well tolerated but did not improve neurological outcomes or modify HIF-1α and HSP27 levels. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04400981.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.