ReviewFrontiers in microbiomes2026
Endophyte-mediated pest resistance: mechanisms, evidence gaps, and translational opportunities.
Review in Frontiers in microbiomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Escalating crop losses caused by insect pests, together with pesticide resistance, environmental persistence, and increasing regulatory scrutiny of conventional agrochemicals, have intensified interest in biologically based pest-management strategies. Endophytic bacteria and fungi represent a promising avenue for crop protection because they can influence plant defense, pest performance, and multitrophic interactions within plant tissues. This review critically synthesizes the 'landscape' of endophyte-mediated pest resistance-the 'journey' of microbes from colonization to field protection-through direct antagonism by insecticidal metabolites and enzymes, immune priming, signaling crosstalk (i.e., jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and ethylene pathways), volatile organic compound-mediated indirect defense, and microbiome restructuring. We further evaluate the strength of evidence across laboratory, greenhouse, and field studies, distinguishing well-supported mechanisms from responses that remain context-dependent or insufficiently validated under agronomic conditions. This implies that endophyte-based pest resistance will remain difficult to translate unless colonization stability, host specificity, ecological trade-offs, formulation performance, biosafety, and regulatory requirements are addressed together. Future progress will require standardized efficacy testing, multiomics-based mechanism validation, improved delivery systems, predictive strain-selection pipelines, and transparent biosafety frameworks. By linking mechanism, evidence strength, and deployment barriers, this review provides a translational framework for moving endophyte-mediated pest resistance from experimental promise toward field-ready crop protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.