Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707971›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026

Artificial intelligence in child nutrition and eating behavior: from prediction to gastronomic mediation.

Lu Xing, Xueqi Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lu XingSchool of Preschool Education, Changsha Normal University, Changsha, China.
Xueqi WuTaylor's Culinary Institute, Faculty of Social Sciences and Leisure Management, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering child nutrition through dietary assessment, malnutrition forecasting, clinical decision support, meal recommendation, conversational interventions, and food-environment monitoring. The consequences of these applications converge in everyday eating. This Mini Review synthesizes evidence on how AI measures nutritional states and mediates food choice, communication, sensory acceptance, family practice, and digital exposure. The evidence supports two connected functions. As nutritional intelligence, AI converts clinical, dietary, and environmental data into assessments or predictions. As gastronomic mediation, it participates in decisions about what foods are noticed, recommended, prepared, discussed, and accepted. Direct pediatric validation is strongest for bounded assessment and forecasting tasks. Child meal-planning studies and generative-AI evaluations based on standardized adolescent profiles reveal a gap between nutrient optimization, culinary coherence, and nutritional safety. A large adolescent chatbot trial combined scalable delivery with null intention-to-treat effects on diet quality and BMI trajectory. Co-design and behavioral studies further identify familiarity, texture, participation, and caregiver involvement as central design variables. We propose five iterative translational gates: technical validity, nutritional validity, behavioral acceptability, contextual legitimacy, and real-world effectiveness and implementation. Future research should combine age-specific nutritional constraints with sensory and cultural knowledge, evaluate performance across food cultures, preserve professional and caregiver oversight, and test outcomes in homes, schools, clinics, and digital food environments. AI can advance child-focused gastronomy by translating computational outputs into safe, culturally meaningful, and developmentally appropriate eating practices.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencechild-centered designchild nutritiondigital food environmenteating behaviorfood culturegastronomypersonalized nutrition

Identifiers

PMID42707971
PMCPMC13548810

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.