Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707993›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in dementia2026

Nature-based interventions for people living with dementia and their carers: a scoping review.

Manpreet K Gill, Shareefa Thekkan, Danine Irwin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in dementia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manpreet K GillDementia Adventure, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Shareefa ThekkanDementia Adventure, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Danine IrwinDementia Adventure, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nature-based interventions are increasingly recognised as a promising non-pharmacological approach to support people living with dementia and their carers. Although a growing body of research has explored the relationship between nature engagement and dementia, the evidence remains dispersed across a wide range of intervention types, settings and outcome measures. This review aimed to identify and map the available evidence relating to nature-based interventions for people living with dementia and their carers. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were undertaken across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Emerald Insight and the Cochrane Library. Evidence selection was conducted independently by two reviewers. Data were charted and synthesised using narrative synthesis and thematic categorisation. Results: A total of 108 studies were included. Six overarching themes were identified: Therapeutic Gardens and Environmental Design ( Discussion: The evidence suggests that nature-based interventions may offer benefits beyond wellbeing alone, supporting identity, social participation and meaningful engagement for people living with dementia and their carers. However, the evidence base remains unevenly developed, with limited research relating to implementation, blue spaces, technology-based approaches and underrepresented populations. Future research should focus on improving accessibility, understanding implementation and broadening the range of nature-based approaches available to people affected by dementia.

Indexed as

carersdementiagardeninggreen care farmsgreen spacehorticulturenature-based interventionsoutdoor activity

Identifiers

PMID42707993
PMCPMC13548805

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.