ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2026
Avian cochlear nucleus neurons exhibit tonotopic specializations across development.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tonotopy is a hallmark feature of auditory structures that describes the spatial separation of sound frequencies along a gradient from high to low. Identifying biophysical differences along the frequency axis is essential for understanding how tonotopic maps develop in auditory structures and how these maps serve specific functions. In the mammalian cochlear nucleus and the analogous avian nucleus magnocellularis (NM), neurons are arranged along a tonotopic gradient resulting from ordered synaptic connections from the auditory nerve. Although mature NM neurons exhibit some intrinsic (i.e., ion channel) differences along the tonotopic axis, it is unclear whether these intrinsic properties of high- and low-frequency neurons diverge in phenotype across development or if they instead converge by embryonic maturation to resemble each other, suggesting offset developmental timelines. Using whole cell patch-clamp electrophysiology, we recorded from high- and low-frequency NM neurons in the embryonic chicken at early (E12-13), middle (E15-16), and late (E20-21) developmental stages. High- and low-frequency neurons differed in their action potential rise and repolarization rates during development, but these differences disappeared by late development, indicating a tonotopic developmental progression from high- to low-frequency neurons. However, neuronal input resistance, rheobase, and action potential latency were distinct across the tonotopic axis and remained so across development. High-frequency neurons had more low-voltage-activated potassium channels than low-frequency neurons at each developmental stage, thereby mediating differences in action potential properties. Overall, although some intrinsic properties converged in high- and low-frequency neurons by embryonic maturity, other disparities persisted, suggesting distinct phenotypes of high- and low-frequency neurons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.