Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709302›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Evaluation of different probiotic administration methods on productive performance, visceral organs, intestinal bacteria, and morphology in broiler chickens.

Rita Mutia, Komang G Wiryawan, Asep Gunawan, Asnath Maria Fuah, Muhammad Ridla, Brahmadhita Pratama Mahardhika, Arif Darmawan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rita MutiaDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia. ritamutia@apps.ipb.ac.id.
Komang G WiryawanDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia.
Asep GunawanDepartment of Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia.
Asnath Maria FuahDepartment of Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia.
Muhammad RidlaDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia.
Brahmadhita Pratama MahardhikaFaculty of Animal Science, Islamic University of Malang, Malang, 65144, Indonesia.
Arif DarmawanDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different probiotic administration methods on productive performance, intestinal health, and visceral organ development in broiler chickens. The study used 400 one-day-old unsexed Lohmann broiler chicks reared for 35 days and randomly allocated into 4 treatments and 5 replicates (20 birds per replicate) using a completely randomized design. The probiotics contained Lactobacillus sp. (2 × 10

Indexed as

ChickensGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIntestinesProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsMaleRandom AllocationDrinking waterIntestinal healthLitterProbioticSpray

Identifiers

PMID42709302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.