ArticleCrop health2026
Self-DNA acts as an immunostimulant for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) that induces defense against pests and diseases and increases seed yield.
Article in Crop health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treating plants with plant-derived DNA triggers a strong and usually highly self/nonself-specific immune response. Several studies reported an induction of early signaling responses, resistance gene expression, and increased resistance to certain biotic stressors for self-DNA-treated Arabidopsis and also for crops like bean, lettuce, tomato, maize, or peach. These results indicate that self-DNA might bear potential as a tool for future strategies for a preventive biological pest control. However, it remains to be studied how DNA treatment affects different major defense hormones, to which degree responses at the early signaling levels predict the resistance at the phenotypic level, and whether the results of the earlier, lab-based studies would translate to the agronomic field. Here, we treated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plantlets with self-DNA and with nonself-DNA from a congeneric species (lima bean, Phaseolus lunatus) and from a more distantly related species in the same family (Acacia farnesiana). We observed a self/nonself-specific induction of jasmonic acid only by self-DNA that was associated with decreased feeding by a chewing herbivore. By contrast, salicylic acid was induced by self- and nonself-DNA to similar degrees, which was also reflected in reduced population densities of several pathogenic fungi and bacteria. Most importantly, under open field conditions, a single self-DNA-treatment increased yield approximately 1.5-fold in the rainy season and 3.2-fold in the dry season. We suggest that self-DNA merits attention as a tool for future, preventive strategies in the biological control of pests and plant diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.