ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2026
Development and interpretability of a machine learning model for postoperative hypothermia prediction in placenta previa Cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo develop and validate an explainable machine learning prediction model for perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing cesarean delivery for placenta previa, and to identify key predictive factors to support clinical individualized temperature management and nursing decision-making.MethodsThis study is a retrospective secondary analysis conducted using BioStudies public databases. Ten machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest, were used to build hypothermia prediction models. Accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC were selected as evaluation metrics to screen for the optimal model, and LIME was applied to generate individualized explanations for single-sample prediction outputs. A total of 167 real-world patients served as the independent test cohort, while 1000 synthetic data cases generated by the Synthetic Data Vault (SDV) algorithm served as the training cohort.ResultsPerformance comparisons across models showed the random forest model reached an AUC of 0.781 in the training set, but only 0.638 in the test set, a sign of severe overfitting. Gradient boosting models had a universally low test set recall of below 0.25, carrying a high risk of missed diagnosis. The logistic regression (LR) model exhibited the optimal overall performance: it attained the highest test-cohort accuracy among all evaluated models, with an AUC of 0.705, F1-score of 0.430, and recall of 0.327. Feature importance analysis found intraoperative blood loss to be the strongest predictor of hypothermia, followed by body weight as the second core contributing factor. LIME can intuitively visualize feature contributions for individual sample predictions. These outputs enable nurses to develop tailored warming intervention regimens.ConclusionThe logistic regression prediction model developed in this study may serve as a clinically useful tool with adequate generalization capacity and clinical interpretability for identifying hypothermia risk in patients undergoing cesarean delivery for placenta previa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.