ArticlePloS one2026
Stigma reduction as quality health care: A qualitative study of structural level mechanisms to address stigma.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impacts of stigma on health are well-known. Most interventions to reduce stigma focus on education or skills building of health workers and less on organisational or structural approaches. Responding to ongoing efforts to increase the quality of health care, we explore data from semi-structured interviews with 20 key stakeholders to identify and examine stigma reduction opportunities that align with existing practices, policies and structures for strengthening quality in the Australian healthcare system. Analysis focused on the "outer setting" constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify and categorise mechanisms that linked to or were determined by governing processes of the ("outer setting"). The necessity to be accredited against national standards was positioned as an over-arching driver of what health systems do and what gets the attention of leaders and executives, and can subsequently impact allocation of resources, including for stigma reduction. Participants' accounts also raise the possibility of using other more general industrial relations laws to bring greater attention to stigma reduction. Innovative approaches to stigma reduction using macro, structural tools provide a promising opportunity to trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.