ArticlePLoS genetics2026
Development of a low-coverage whole genome sequencing screen for apomixis using a diverse set of Malus germplasm.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past decade, plant biologists have made several major discoveries pertaining to the genetic basis of apomixis (clonal propagation by seed) that have shown promise in preserving high-value hybrid rice and sorghum genotypes. This progress was made possible by foundational gene discovery efforts in model species and natural apomicts, but pleiotropic obstacles still limit its broad agricultural adoption, especially in eudicots. Thus, it follows that investigations of novel apomicts should lead to the development of new molecular tools for plant breeding. The two most common ways to identify clonal seed production are flow-cytometry seed screens and genome sequencing to compare the DNA sequences of the maternal parent and progeny, traditionally using low-throughput markers. While flow-cytometry has been the dominant method for more than two decades, it provides indirect information on the genetics of a resulting embryo and can be ineffective in certain species. Here we developed a method using short-read whole-genome sequencing at moderately low coverage (averaging 3X and 6X) to screen diverse Malus genotypes maintained in a USDA germplasm collection for clonal seed production. In total, we sequenced 55 genotypes, 1,216 of their embryos, and identified 17 previously undescribed apomictic genotypes. Several more were detected with the flow cytometry seed screen, which helped resolve certain types of reproduction and sources of noise in low-coverage datasets. This low-pass screening-by-sequencing method is a relatively low-cost, rapid method for detecting apomictic genotypes in diverse plant germplasm and when used thoughtfully in conjunction with flow cytometry, provides a new way to visualize the genetic outcomes of sexual and asexual reproduction in plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.