ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Clusters, fingers, and singles: A mechanical landscape of tumor invasion.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Collective invasion is a key mechanism by which tumors disseminate and metastasize, involving coordinated migration of heterogeneous cell populations. Experimental studies in spheroid-based assays have identified specialized leader and follower cells that work together during this process, but the biophysical rules governing their interaction remain unclear. We present a mechanistic, cell-based computational model using the Cellular Potts framework to investigate how heterotypic adhesion, leader motility, and follower proliferation jointly shape invasion. Leader-follower tumors were simulated across 13 310 parameter sets, and invasion was quantified by invasive and infiltrative areas, finger-like protrusions, solitary defectors, and detached clusters. From these simulations, we identified four distinct invasion phenotypes: non-invasive, bulk collective, single-cell, and multimodal. Multimodal invasion-the coexistence of cohesive strands, solitary cells, and small clusters-emerged as the most prevalent phenotype, particularly under moderate adhesion and high motility. Proliferation increased tumor bulk rather than determining invasion mode, which was governed primarily by adhesion and leader motility. Mapping outcomes across the parameter space revealed sharp transitions between invasion modes, underscoring trade-offs between adhesion and motility in shaping invasion complexity. Our results show that hybrid invasion behaviors, previously considered rare, arise robustly from simple mechanical rules and are favored in a broad region of the parameter space. This framework reconciles binary models of invasion with experimental observations of heterogeneity, providing predictive insights into how modulating adhesion and motility may modify invasive behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.