ReviewInteractive journal of medical research2026
Enhancing Healthy Longevity: Scoping Review of Practices and Interventions.
Review in Interactive journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Healthy Longevity: Scoping Review of Practices and Interventions.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Over the past 2 decades, concerns have arisen about the distinction between health span and lifespan, highlighting that longevity does not necessarily equate to good health, a concept often referred to as "healthy longevity." While various strategies have been explored to promote healthy aging and achieve healthy longevity, it remains uncertain which practices are most effective. Objective: This scoping review identifies the existing and emerging practices and interventions that promote healthy longevity, identifies the key components of these practices and interventions, and considers how stakeholders contribute to these practices and interventions. Methods: A scoping review of the literature was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's 6-stage framework. The Joanna Briggs Institute Population-Concept-Context framework was used to define the eligibility criteria and select studies reporting practices or interventions aimed at achieving a long health span or promoting healthy longevity carried out in the community. Data were manually extracted by 2 independent reviewers to detail the characteristics of these practices and interventions and guide the data charting process and narrative synthesis. Six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) were searched for academic papers published between January 2010 and February 2025. Results: A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n=15, 71%) were published after 2020 and were predominantly conducted in high-income settings (n=17, 81%) across North America, Europe, and Asia. Four study types were identified: interventional (n=7, 33%), intervention development (n=4, 19%), association (n=5, 24%), and descriptive (n=5, 24%). Interventional and intervention development studies primarily described multicomponent programs targeting individual and social determinants of health and generally reported beneficial effects on physical, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes. Association studies linked micro-, meso-, and macro-level factors (eg, nutrition, household expenditure, housing quality, health insurance, and public financing policy) to healthy longevity indicators. Descriptive studies highlighted themes across the micro and meso levels, including finance, physical activity, mental and spiritual health, digital literacy, independent living, safety, social support, and health care support. Conclusions: The identified community-based strategies, practices, and policies that extend health span represent the joint efforts of multiple stakeholders and disciplines. The implementation of these practices and policies is worthy of being supported. More studies in diverse socioeconomic contexts are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.