ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Modeling complex narrative memory via sentence recognition: A marriage of distributional semantic models and an episodic model (MINERVA 2).
Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent research has integrated representations from distributional semantic models (DSMs) with traditional episodic memory models. While these integrated frameworks show promise in modeling single-word recognition, their applicability to the recognition of full sentences-particularly those embedded in complex narrative contexts-remains tentative. In this study, participants read short narratives and completed an OLD/NEW sentence recognition task, administered either immediately or after a delay of >10 hours. The recognition test contained four types of sentence probes: verbatim (matching the narrative word-for-word), paraphrase (conveying the same information with different wording), inference (logically inferred from the narrative but unstated), and wrong (information inconsistent with the narrative). We replicated prior findings that verbatim probes were judged OLD most often, followed by paraphrase, then by inference, and then by wrong probes. To model these behavioral findings, we imported semantic word representations from two DSMs, Latent Semantic Analysis and the Random Permutation Model, into MINERVA 2. Notably, we preregistered our modeling procedure and parameters for Study 2-one of the first in computational memory research-allowing us to generate predictions rather than postdictions. Overall, the MINERVA 2 model with DSM semantic representations performed very well and captured the key behavioral findings. Importantly, the integrated model substantially outperformed a version of the model where words were represented via randomly generated vectors, and also outperformed the DSM vectors when used on their own. These findings suggest that integrating semantic and episodic models of memory is crucial for accounting for the complexities of recognition of words, sentences, and whole narratives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42711525What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.