SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Global landscape, research hotspots, and evolutionary trends in childhood adversity and chronic disease research: a bibliometric analysis based on three databases.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are increasingly recognized as important life-course determinants of chronic disease risk. However, the overall knowledge structure, research hotspots, and developmental trends in this field remain insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to systematically map the global research landscape of childhood adversity and chronic diseases through bibliometric analysis. Methods: Literature related to childhood adversity and chronic diseases was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), Scopus, and PubMed from database inception to December 31, 2025. After data conversion, merging, screening, and deduplication, bibliometric analyses were conducted to evaluate publication trends, contributions of countries, institutions, authors, and journals, collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence, and citation impact using R, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. Results: A total of 5,369 publications were included. Annual publication output showed a sustained upward trend, especially after 2010, indicating rapidly growing scholarly interest in this field. The United States dominated in both publication output and citation impact and showed strong international collaboration, while the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, and Australia were also major contributors. The University of California System and Harvard University were central in the institutional collaboration network. Keyword analysis identified major hotspots including childhood adversity/child abuse, depression, obesity, stress, risk factors, and cardiovascular disease, with emerging attention to chronic pain, chronic fatigue, and intergenerational effects. Highly cited studies were largely centered on the ACE framework and its associations with major adult health risks, reflecting a stable knowledge base for the field. Conclusions: Research on childhood adversity and chronic diseases has developed into a mature and expanding interdisciplinary field with a clear international collaboration structure and an evolving thematic focus. The field is shifting from early association-based research toward mechanistic exploration and evidence integration. Future studies should strengthen the standardization of exposure and outcome definitions, expand longitudinal and causal evidence, and promote risk-stratified prevention and translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.