ReviewJournal of inflammation research2026
Mepolizumab in Pediatric Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Clinical Applications.
Review in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to critically summarize current evidence on the biological rationale, efficacy, safety, patient selection, and clinical positioning of mepolizumab in children and adolescents with severe eosinophilic asthma. Severe eosinophilic asthma in childhood is associated with recurrent exacerbations, impaired quality of life, healthcare utilization, and cumulative corticosteroid toxicity. Mepolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-5 and is approved as add-on treatment for severe eosinophilic asthma in children aged 6 years and older. Pediatric pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies demonstrate profound and sustained suppression of blood eosinophils, while randomized and real-world evidence consistently supports a reduction in severe exacerbations. Available data also suggest corticosteroid-sparing effects and reduced healthcare utilization in selected patients, whereas improvements in lung function and daily symptom control are less consistent. Pediatric studies indicate a generally favorable safety and tolerability profile, although long-term pediatric-specific data remain limited. Within the current biologic treatment landscape, mepolizumab appears particularly relevant when eosinophilic inflammation, recurrent exacerbations, and corticosteroid burden represent the dominant treatable traits. However, the pediatric evidence base remains substantially smaller than that available in adults, and no head-to-head trials have directly compared mepolizumab with other biologics. Important unresolved issues include the identification of more precise predictors of response, the optimal duration of treatment, criteria for treatment withdrawal or switching, and the potential disease-modifying effects of early biologic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.