Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42714653›Full record

ReviewTropical animal health and production2026

Challenges and sustainable solutions in multispecies extensive livestock production systems across India's agroclimatic zones.

Dhawal Kant Yadav, Deeksha Maletha, Anil Kumar Puniya, Suresh Kumar Mojjada, Seema Yadav

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dhawal Kant YadavLivestock Production Management, ICAR-National Research Centre on Camel, Bikaner, Rajasthan, 334001, India. dhawal.rao@icar.org.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3792-7072
Deeksha MalethaVeterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, 834001, India.
Anil Kumar PuniyaICAR-National Research Centre on Camel, Bikaner, 334001, Rajasthan, India.
Suresh Kumar MojjadaInformation Communication Management Division, ICAR-National Academy for Agricultural Research and Management, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500030, India.
Seema YadavLivestock Production Management, Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute Zone 3, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive livestock production systems support over 70 million rural households across India's 15 agroclimatic zones, yet face interconnected challenges of feed scarcity (national deficits of approximately 11-32% for green fodder, 23% for dry fodder, and 29-40% for concentrates, with localized winter shortages reaching ~ 68% in some humid zones), water stress (intensifying under climate change), inadequate veterinary coverage, and welfare compromises. This review adopts a systems analysis approach to examine feed-water-health-welfare-climate interactions across multiple species (cattle, buffalo, sheep, goat, camel) in ecologically diverse production environments.

methodsWe synthesized evidence from approximately 350 sources and field innovations to develop an integrated framework mapping resource flows, constraint interactions, and adaptive capacity across zones. We synthesized reported trade-offs between productivity enhancement, emissions mitigation, and welfare improvement based on evidence reported across studies. KEY SYSTEMS

findingsLiterature consistently reports that feed and water constraints interact non-additively in zones with > 30% feed deficit with several studies reporting approximately 1.5-2-fold amplification of drought impacts on productivity. These values represent reported ranges synthesized conceptually rather than a pooled statistical estimate. Indigenous innovations (Johads, chauka systems, ethno-veterinary practices) yield 30-40% gains in resource efficiency when integrated with modern inputs in arid/semi-arid cattle-goat systems (Pankaj et al. 2023; Kanwal et al. 2020). Species-zone matching shows thermal-tolerant breeds maintain 15-20% higher productivity (Kankrej cattle, Barbari goats) than crossbreeds under heat stress (> 35 °C) (Sarang et al. 2024; Sejian et al. 2019; Das 2017). Dietary additives reduce enteric methane by 17-98%, ranging from tannin-rich forages (~ 17-20%) to Asparagopsis seaweed (up to ~ 98% under in vitro/in vivo conditions) in small ruminants and cattle (Verma and Kumar Verma 2025; Mwangi et al. 2023; Amad and Zentek 2023). SYSTEMS INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK: We propose a conceptual decision-support matrix integrating breed selection, feed management, water harvesting, and veterinary delivery across 15 zones, identifying optimal intervention packages. Zone-specific vulnerability indices highlight critical thresholds based on synthesized evidence from the literature. Arid zones (13-14) are reported to experience compounding welfare and productivity decline when summer temperatures exceed approximately 42 °C for extended periods (in the order of 90 days), consistent with heat-stress thresholds documented in the literature (Sejian et al. 2019; Mishra et al. 2024). IMPLICATIONS: Sustainable transformation requires synergistic implementation of traditional knowledge and technological innovation, gender-inclusive extension (women provide 50% plus labor) and policy frameworks addressing cross-scale interactions. Research gaps include empirical validation of welfare indicators, emission baselines for indigenous breeds, and community-based institutional models. Our integrated framework enables evidence-based resource allocation and supports India's climate commitments while enhancing rural livelihoods.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryConservation of Natural ResourcesLivestockAnimal FeedAnimalsAnimal WelfareClimate ChangeIndiaAgricultural systems analysisAgroclimatic adaptationClimate resilienceExtensive livestockFeed-water interactionsSystems integration

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.