Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42715177›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Religious beliefs and practices, political orientation, and distrust in healthcare predict attitudes toward mRNA vaccines in the United States.

Erin D Solomon, Eu Gene Chin, Kari Baldwin, Lauren L Baker, James M DuBois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erin D SolomonDivision of General Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3295-0698
Eu Gene ChinRosemead School of Psychology, Biola University, La Mirada, California, United States of America.
Kari BaldwinDivision of General Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Lauren L BakerDivision of General Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6627-9079
James M DuBoisDivision of General Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3712-7051

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Religion and support for genomic healthcare: An exploratory study of the US public and faith leaders.R01HG012830 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DUBOIS, JAMES M · 2022 to 2024
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Religion has contributed to societal divides regarding COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. In this study, we conducted a secondary analysis of a survey of U.S. adults (N = 4939) focused on how religious affiliations, beliefs, and practices impact attitudes toward genetic and genomic activities, one of which was mRNA vaccines. The dataset included large samples of participants from six religious groups in the U.S. (Black Protestant, Catholic, Evangelical Protestant, Jewish, Mainline Protestant, and Muslim), as well as individuals who were atheist, agnostic, or spiritual. ANCOVA results indicated that Evangelical Protestant participants showed significantly less support for mRNA vaccines than other groups, while atheist participants were the most supportive. Muslim participants had the highest concerns, whereas atheist participants had the lowest. Regression analyses indicated the strongest predictors of support for mRNA vaccines were more spiritual community support for community health, followed by higher acceptance of evolution, more liberal political orientation, less distrust toward the healthcare system, higher frequency of attending religious activities, higher income, lower fundamentalist religious beliefs, and more spiritual community support for liberal reproductive and end of life views. The strongest predictors of concerns about mRNA vaccines were more distrust toward the healthcare system and more conservative political orientation, followed by less spiritual community support for community health, stronger beliefs about God in the body, more fundamentalist religious beliefs, and lower knowledge of genetics. The large sample size and examination of a broad array of religious variables alongside distrust and political orientation offer new insights. These findings add to the literature on the culture wars surrounding mRNA vaccines, and can perhaps aid in future efforts to build trust and relationships between public health and religious communities.

Identifiers

PMID42715177
PMCPMC13557370

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.