Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42715196›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Transforming GP practices into multiprofessional primary care centers: The role of nursing professionals (PRIMA) - study protocol for a multicenter non-randomized, controlled, parallel-group intervention study.

Philipp Naß, Wiebke Schüttig, Amelie Flothow, Marie Coors, Leonie Sundmacher, Regina Stolz, Anika Klein, Stefanie Joos, Iris An der Heiden, Ann-Kathrin Jöchner and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Philipp NaßDepartment of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7625-2929
Wiebke SchüttigDepartment of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Amelie FlothowDepartment of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marie CoorsDepartment of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6800-3326
Leonie SundmacherDepartment of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Regina StolzInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Anika KleinInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Stefanie JoosInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Iris An der HeidenInstitute for Health and Social Research Berlin, Germany.
Ann-Kathrin JöchnerInstitute for Health and Social Research Berlin, Germany.
Hans-Dieter NoltingInstitute for Health and Social Research Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5882-7666
Hannah HaumannInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
PRIMA Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGermany faces increasing challenges in primary care due to demographic change, workforce shortages, and the growing prevalence of chronic conditions. Integrating nursing professionals into primary care teams may improve continuity, comprehensiveness, and efficiency of care, but evidence for the German setting remains limited. The PRIMA project (DRKS00039104) implements a new care model that transforms general practices into multiprofessional primary care centers integrating specially trained nursing professionals. The objective is a productivity- and quality-oriented reorganization of care for patients with chronic diseases. The intervention targets patients with high-risk chronic diseases. Core elements include extended nursing services, subsidiary task allocation within the practice team, structured organizational development, and optional use of a medical triage software.

methodsEffectiveness and health-economic outcomes are evaluated in a prospective, quasi-experimental, controlled study under real-world conditions. The intervention group includes patients from 20 participating practices; the control group is matched using routine claims data. The primary endpoint is the number of ambulatory care-sensitive emergency cases after 12 months, analyzed intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes include healthcare utilization, mortality, continuity, and coordination of care. Statistical analyses will account for confounding and clustering at practice and patient level. The health economic evaluation will estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios based on ambulatory and total healthcare costs. A parallel process evaluation uses longitudinal mixed-methods. It comprises interviews, activity logs and focus groups, and surveys among patients, their relatives, practice teams and collaborators. Key aspects assessed include implementation facilitators and barriers, organizational development and interprofessional collaboration, nurse role development, and patient quality of life and treatment satisfaction. DISCUSSION: Findings are highly relevant for strengthening primary care in Germany and internationally, where multidisciplinary primary care centers are increasingly promoted. If successful, the intervention could reduce emergencies and improve patient outcomes, serving as a scalable model and informing policy and reimbursement strategies.

Indexed as

General PracticeNurse's RolePrimary Health CareClinical Trials as TopicGermanyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesTask Shifting

Identifiers

PMID42715196
PMCPMC13557340

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.