ArticleJMIR nursing2026
Recommendations From a Health Care Provider's Perspective for Better Implementation of Telemedicine and Telenursing: Descriptive Qualitative Approach.
Article in JMIR nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital technology-based health care services like telemedicine and telenursing are expanding quickly globally. Although the use of telemedicine and telenursing has shown promise, there are a number of obstacles to overcome. Objective: This study aimed to determine the experiences of stakeholders with using telenursing and telemedicine during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This study combined descriptive qualitative analysis using a focus group discussion (FGD) and validation using a review of the literature. The literature search used a convenience approach with the keywords benefits, advantages, disadvantages, obstacles, and constraints of telenursing or telemedicine to find relevant journal articles. Two FGDs were conducted during the COVID-19 period, namely 2020-2022, with the first FGD held in 2022. The second FGD was conducted in 2023-2024 to determine the implementation of telenursing and telemedicine during the recovery period, with data collection in 2024. The FGDs were conducted via the online Zoom platform, and a total of 23 participants were selected based on purposive sampling. People involved in the development and implementation of telemedicine or telenursing were included. Data analysis was conducted in 2 stages: the first using an inductive method, which was followed by triangulation using a deductive method. The results were verified and validated based on the reviewed literature. Results: We identified three themes: (1) health care providers have experience using telemedicine/telenursing; (2) telemedicine and telenursing have many benefits; and (3) telemedicine and telenursing have 5M (method, man, money, material, and machine) factors that must be anticipated. Key statements were identified and validated, then matched with the literature review. Conclusions: The benefits and barriers of telemedicine and telenursing were identified. For telemedicine to run smoothly, preparation of 5M elements is necessary. Implications for health care services necessitate the creation of operational guidelines for the implementation of telemedicine and telenursing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.