ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
POCUS for the general pediatrician: a narrative review of practical applications, policy, and training.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly recognized as a valuable bedside imaging modality in pediatric medicine, enabling rapid real-time patient assessment and procedural guidance. While its use is well established in pediatric emergency and critical care settings, its role in general pediatric practice is expanding. This narrative review summarizes the practical applications of POCUS relevant to general pediatricians, focusing on lung imaging, focused functional cardiac assessment, ultrasound-guided vascular access, and the image governance required for safe implementation. A narrative review of contemporary pediatric literature and relevant consensus guidance was undertaken, focusing on evidence applicable to general pediatric practice, including diagnostic performance, procedural utility, education, and governance. Evidence supports the use of POCUS in general pediatrics as a means to improve diagnostic confidence and procedural outcomes. Lung ultrasound demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for common pediatric respiratory conditions, including consolidation and pleural effusion, and may reduce reliance on chest radiography. Focused cardiac ultrasound provides actionable insights into fluid responsiveness and ventricular function at the bedside, facilitating timely decision-making and early identification of cardiogenic shock. Ultrasound-guided vascular access improves cannulation success rates and reduces complication risks, especially in children with difficult access. Despite these benefits, the adoption of POCUS in general pediatrics remains uneven across Europe, primarily due to variability in training standards, credentialing processes, and institutional support.
conclusionPOCUS has the potential to enhance bedside pediatric assessment by improving diagnostic confidence, procedural safety, and responsiveness to clinical change. Safe and equitable integration into general pediatric practice will require structured training, clear governance, routine image archiving, and a coordinated approach to competency and implementation. WHAT IS KNOWN: • POCUS supports bedside assessment and procedural success in pediatric emergency and critical care. • Lung, focused cardiac and ultrasound-guided vascular access may also benefit general pediatric practice. WHAT IS NEW: • This review defines a pragmatic core POCUS scope for general pediatricians. • It links that scope to image governance and an author-proposed tiered competency framework for European implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42717031What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.