ArticleClinical transplantation2026
Living Donor Training During ASTS Fellowship: Disparities in Autonomy Between Kidney and Liver Donation. A National Survey.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLiving donor transplantation should be a cornerstone for kidney and liver transplant surgeons. However, achieving technical independence, especially in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), remains a challenge. This survey evaluates the experiences and barriers faced during the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) Fellowship Program and proposes solutions to improve autonomy in living donor transplantation.
methodsA 93-item questionnaire was distributed via LimeSurvey to former ASTS Fellows, gathering demographic information, training experiences, and autonomy levels in living donor kidney (LDKT) and liver transplantation (LDLT) after the two-year fellowship. Responses were received from 95 participants. We performed descriptive analyses and exploratory paired comparisons between LDKT and LDLT domains.
resultsA total of 95 former fellows initiated the survey; 41 (43.6%) completed all items and were included in the analyses. The survey revealed significant differences in independence levels between LDKT and LDLT. While 82.9% of fellows felt very or completely confident in LDKT, only 29.2% felt similarly for LDLT (p < 0.001). A majority (90.2%) believed the ASTS fellowship structure enabled independence in LDKT, but only 9.7% thought the same for LDLT (p < 0.001). Robust training in LDKT was reported, with 63.4% of fellows achieving independence in donor nephrectomy, compared to only 14.6% in donor hepatectomy (p < 0.001). Fellows performed a median of 30 living donor nephrectomies as primary surgeons, but only 4 hepatectomies during the fellowship (p < 0.0001). Low LDLT case volumes, lack of structured curricula, and limited opportunities to act as primary surgeons were key barriers. 68.3% felt fully or mostly prepared to lead a living donor programme in LDKT, compared to 7.3% in LDLT (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsThe ASTS fellowship provides an excellent foundation for LDKT, fostering independence in laparoscopic and robotic approaches. However, independence in LDLT remains difficult to achieve under the current structure. Solutions include formalized curricula, mandated primary surgeon roles in LDLT procedures, and double-console robotic systems for guided learning. Addressing these gaps is essential to prepare future transplant surgeons for the increasing demands of living donor transplantation programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.