ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Deep DNA and protein level feature integration for robust clinical variant interpretation using probabilistic gradient boosting.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A major challenge in clinical genomics is to classify genetic variations correctly, since it directly affects disease diagnosis and personal care. The existing methods tend to be based on the combination of different factors, such as protein structure, population frequencies, phenotypic annotations, and sequence conservation. Nevertheless, these methods often cannot be used to achieve the necessary interpretability, quantify uncertainty, and address rare cases. This paper presents a probabilistic gradient boosting model on variant pathogenicity prediction. The suggested framework applies biological characteristics at both level of DNA and protein levels while also scaling the level of uncertainty in clinical decision making. Our machine learning aims to solve the issues of variant interpretation by managing the features and through probability-based pathogenicity prediction. The framework formulation is aimed at generalizing over various datasets and minimizing overfitting. At the same time, it can ensure reasonable performance to facilitate clinical experiments. The model has also been tested on three standard datasets and demonstrated to be more predictive of the pathogenic effect of variants, in comparison with a variety of existing tools. The probabilistic gradient boosting model proposed had ROC AUC values of 0.9293, 0.9610, and 0.9646 on ClinVar variants, GRCh37, and GRCh38 human genome respectively. Furthermore, the dataset was ensured to include both exonic and intronic variants, and Variants of Uncertain Significance were also taken into consideration for Performance Testing. Through this it also aims to provide better clinical significance which will lead to a good interpretable tool for priority of variants for a large variety of disease conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.