ReviewClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2026
A systematic review of the clinical correlates of delusions in Parkinson's disease.
Review in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Research within Parkinson's disease (PD) psychosis has mostly focused on hallucinations due to their higher prevalence, limiting our understanding of the clinical correlates of delusions. This review aims to systematically review the content and clinical correlates of delusions in PD, including demographic, motor and non-motor symptoms and medication. Method: Following PRISMA Guidelines, a search on Ovid Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Embase was performed to include English language studies evaluating delusions in PD. Data extraction included study and patient characteristics, clinical factors, outcome measures and cognitive correlates. Risk of bias was assessed for each study. Results: Seven studies were eligible. Persecutory delusions were most commonly reported; and one study focused solely on delusional misidentification. Delusional jealousy was associated with younger age and shorter disease duration, and a single study reported a higher prevalence in men. Delusions were associated with motor symptoms but less strongly than hallucinations, neither were delusions associated with cognitive deficits, apart from delusional misidentification, which was associated with deficits in verbal memory and language. A diagnosis of depression and the severity of anxiety symptoms predicted the presence and number of delusional types. Dopamine agonists were commonly prescribed, but there was no association with prescribed dose. Conclusion: The small number and heterogeneity of the included studies limited interpretation and generalizability of our findings and emphasize the need for further investigation of the intersection of age, sex and dopamine agonist use in delusional jealousy, neuropsychological correlates of delusional misidentification and affective and psychological correlates of delusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.