ReviewPhotoacoustics2026
From lab design to clinical translation: photoacoustic endoscopy.
Review in Photoacoustics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photoacoustic endoscopy (PAE) integrates pulsed optical excitation and acoustic detection within miniaturized probes for intraluminal and intracavitary imaging. By combining optical absorption contrast with ultrasound-based detection, PAE complements conventional endoscopy by visualizing subsurface vasculature and providing functional or compositional contrast, including hemoglobin oxygenation, lipid-rich tissue, collagen-associated signals, and molecular probes. This review summarizes scenario-driven PAE development from engineering design to translational application, focusing on optical excitation, acoustic detection, and scanning strategies. We analyze trade-offs among resolution, depth of field, sensitivity, imaging speed, field of view, probe dimensions, and workflow compatibility, and review representative applications in cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, reproductive, urinary, respiratory, and surgical-guidance settings. Current evidence remains largely preclinical or early feasibility. Future translation requires standardized quantitative metrics, laser safety evaluation, robust engineering and prospective clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.