ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Time-bounded uncertainty in childhood cancer survivorship: a psycho-oncology perspective on result communication.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Follow-up after childhood cancer may be clinically routine, but it can still leave families in a poorly defined waiting period. A scan or blood test may be part of routine surveillance; however, the days that follow can feel far from ordinary. Families may not know when the results will arrive, who will interpret them, or whether silence has meaning. This Perspective proposes event-related distress windows (ERDWs) as an early service-design heuristic rather than a diagnosis or validated construct. The contribution is deliberately narrow and therefore testable: ERDW shifts attention from fear as content to waiting as a temporal form of care. It asks whether a modifiable result pathway concentrates uncertainty-related burden within a defined period. Bounded result communication can then be examined as a message condition that gives the interval a clear structure without adding harm. ERDW is useful only if it helps identify candidate pathways, specifies a minimal uncertainty mechanism, and frames a falsifiable service-level question. It should be discussed with survivors, parents, adolescents, multilingual families, and clinical teams before feasibility testing. If temporal concentration, mechanism, or safety cannot be shown, the frame should be narrowed or abandoned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.