Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719569›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026

The social and economic burden of retinopathy of prematurity: screening, treatment, and health policy perspectives in a transnational narrative review.

Maria Ester Canepa, Massimiliano Serafino, Pasquale Striano, Luca A Ramenghi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Ester CanepaDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Mother-Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Massimiliano SerafinoDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Mother-Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Pasquale StrianoDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Mother-Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Luca A RamenghiDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Mother-Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading preventable cause of childhood blindness, particularly among premature infants. This transnational narrative review synthesizes international evidence on the economic and social burden of ROP from 2003 to 2025, focusing on the cost-effectiveness of screening, diagnostic imaging, and treatment strategies. A structured PubMed search using the terms "ROP neonate social cost" and "economic impact of ROP" was supplemented through the "Similar Articles" and "Cited Articles" functions. The review included cost-effectiveness analyses, cost-utility studies, burden-of-disease reports, and policy-related evidence published in all languages. Following the thematic framework proposed by Rivero-Arias et al. (2024), the evidence was synthesized to explore the economic implications of ROP screening and management while informing future policy directions. Evidence from 15 eligible studies identified through the primary search was complemented by 71 additional relevant publications identified through PubMed citation tracking. The available evidence suggests that AI-assisted telescreening and smartphone-based imaging may represent cost-effective and scalable screening strategies, while mobile screening units and national telemedicine networks appear feasible in low- and middle-income countries. The reviewed literature also indicates that the long-term societal costs associated with ROP-related blindness substantially exceed those of timely screening and early intervention. However, important evidence gaps remain regarding long-term follow-up costs, the comparative cost-effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy vs. laser photocoagulation, and the economic consequences of delayed or missed screening. Successful ROP care models involve multisectoral collaboration among healthcare systems, education, and technology stakeholders. National initiatives in Argentina, India, Rwanda, and Saudi Arabia illustrate how integrated screening programmes, digital innovation, and international collaboration may reduce preventable ROP-related blindness while improving equitable access to care. From a policy perspective, healthcare systems should consider prioritizing screening programmes, validated telemedicine and AI-assisted technologies, national screening registries, and workforce training through tele-education. Future research should expand societal cost and cost-effectiveness analyses, particularly in high-income countries, strengthen AI validation studies, and develop country-specific economic models reflecting local healthcare resources and neonatal intensive care unit organization. Adaptive screening policies, supported by interdisciplinary collaboration and regular updates of screening guidelines, will be essential to reducing the long-term social and economic burden of ROP.

Indexed as

blindnessneonatepolicyROPscreening

Identifiers

PMID42719569
PMCPMC13554956

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.