ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
"From misdiagnosis to precision medicine: strengthening pediatric neuro-oncology care in LMICs toward equitable pLGG outcomes".
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric brain tumors-particularly pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG)-represent a major survivorship inequity between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While pLGG is highly curable in optimal-resource settings, outcomes in LMICs remain suboptimal due to delays in diagnosis, limited neurosurgical capacity, restricted access to molecular testing, and significant variability in pathology accuracy and treatment accessibility. Data from international pathology review programs highlight a major diagnostic challenge: misclassification rates of 18-32% for pediatric CNS tumors, with discrepancies often driven by limited neuropathology expertise and lack of essential tools such as immunohistochemistry and molecular profiling. Studies from both global outreach networks and single-institution reviews consistently demonstrate that brain tumors account for the majority of major disagreements, and that molecular markers such as BRAF alterations and H3 mutations are critical for accurate diagnosis and risk stratification. These gaps directly affect treatment decisions and outcomes. At the same time, pLGG treatment paradigms are shifting with the development of oral targeted MAPK-pathway inhibitors, which deliver high response rates with favorable toxicity profiles. These agents hold unique promise for LMIC settings because they avoid the need for prolonged intravenous chemotherapy and reduce dependence on central lines and high-intensity supportive care. However, widespread adoption is limited by cost, regulatory barriers, absence from essential drug lists, and lack of molecular diagnostics required to select patients who would benefit most. This review synthesizes evidence from the evolving pLGG diagnostic and therapeutic landscape, and applies the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer (GICC) CureAll framework to pediatric neuro-oncology care in LMICs. Key strategies include strengthening pathology accuracy through neuropathology partnerships, telepathology, and essential immunohistochemical/molecular panels; as well as integrating pLGG into national cancer control plans, enabling access to targeted therapies through differential pricing and pooled procurement, and building regional molecular diagnostic hubs. Together, these initiatives can reduce diagnostic errors, expand access to precision medicine, and move LMICs closer to equitable outcomes for children with pLGG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.