ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Utilizing allogeneic venous grafts to solve the problem of vascular defects and reconstruction in pancreatic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extensive vascular invasion or defects after resection significantly limit the feasibility of radical pancreatic surgery, underscoring the value of effective vascular reconstruction techniques. This study evaluates a novel approach to vascular reconstruction using allogeneic venous grafts (AVGs) in pancreaticoduodenectomy and pancreatectomy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 187 patients with biliary or pancreatic malignancies or lesions presenting with various types of venous invasion who underwent pancreatic resection with vascular reconstruction using AVGs. The R0 resection rate, long-term patency rate of reconstructed vessels, and overall survival (OS) outcomes were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for postoperative vascular stenosis and poor survival. Results: All patients presented with variable extents of vascular defects and anatomical sites of vascular invasion, including the portal vein-superior mesenteric vein confluence ( Conclusion: The use of AVGs is a feasible and effective technique for vascular reconstruction following major venous resection in patients with locally advanced pancreatic and biliary malignancies. Its application achieved favorable R0 resection rates and acceptable long-term patency and survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.