ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Employee Perceptions of a Clinical Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: During the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States in 2020, hospital systems faced significant challenges, including high patient demand, a lack of resources, and the rapidly evolving safety mandates that necessitated new clinical protocols. However, the perceptions of healthcare workers regarding the effectiveness of their departments and management approaches have not been well described. Methods: Thirty semistructured interviews were conducted with healthcare workers in a single clinical department at a pediatric tertiary care hospital in October 2020, 6 months after the issuance of the state-of-emergency order for the pandemic. Thematic analysis was used to identify and differentiate key insights related to both effective and ineffective practice changes that emerged during this period. Results: The transition to remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic was marked by challenges related to technological adaptation and data security, mitigated in part by proactive logistical support, incorporation of department-wide virtual meetings, and a dedicated task force. Changes in healthcare access practices were necessitated by rapidly evolving guidelines, resulting in innovative patient care approaches. Nevertheless, the blurred boundaries between personal and professional lives exacerbated stress and burnout among personnel, necessitating leadership intervention to reaffirm work-time boundaries and promote strategic task prioritization. Conclusions: Instituting consistent channels of communication is instrumental in offering support and disseminating information to employees. Actively maintaining boundaries and prioritizing work-life balance prevents negative impacts on employee mental health. Healthcare entities should invest in strengthening workplace culture and ensuring that these competencies are integrated into practice beyond crisis situations.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.