Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42720870›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2026

Evaluation of deep-learning iterative reconstruction combined with high-frequency kernels in CT: a task-based image quality study.

Anaïs Viry, Pascal Monnin, Chiara Pozzessere, Damien Racine

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anaïs ViryInstitute of Radiation Physics (IRA), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. anais.viry@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0039-4244
Pascal MonninInstitute of Radiation Physics (IRA), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Chiara PozzessereDepartment of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Damien RacineInstitute of Radiation Physics (IRA), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the image quality of a novel deep-learning iterative reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm combined with high-frequency kernels compared with iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms through the assessment of the detectability of small high-contrast lesions. MATERIALS AND

methodsThree image-quality phantoms were scanned with doses from 0.8 to 15 mGy. Images were reconstructed using ASIR-V0, ASIR-V80, and DLIR (Low, Medium, High), with an edge-enhancing kernel for a chest protocol and a sharp kernel for a spine protocol. A dedicated cubic phantom was used to assess axial, longitudinal resolution, and noise power spectra. Contrast of calcium-based lesions of 3 and 5 mm in diameter was assessed at three concentrations (200, 400, and 800 mg/cc) using two anthropomorphic chest and abdominal phantoms. Detectability was evaluated using a non-prewhitening with eye filter model observer.

resultsIn-plane spatial resolution was stable across DLIR strength levels and slightly better than ASIR-V0, while longitudinal resolution did not depend on algorithms. DLIR markedly reduced image noise, below ASIR-V80 for DLIR-High with both kernels. While IR preserved the contrast of lesions, it decreased with DLIR strength for the small lesion 200 mg/cc-3mm. The highest detectability was achieved with DLIR-High, except for the HA200-3mm below 3 mGy for the chest protocol and 7 mGy for the spine protocol.

conclusionDLIR combined with high-frequency kernels reduced image noise while preserving spatial resolution and FBP-like noise texture, outperforming IR in detectability for most lesion sizes, concentrations, and dose levels. DLIR reduced contrast for small and low-concentration lesions, especially at low doses, which partially counterbalanced its detectability advantage over IR. KEY POINTS: Question This study evaluates whether deep-learning reconstruction with high-frequency kernels improves the detectability of small high-contrast lesions compared to iterative reconstruction. Findings The new deep-learning reconstruction reduces image noise while preserving fine anatomical detail and improving in-plane spatial resolution. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The new deep-learning reconstruction combined with high-frequency kernels improves detection of small lesions in comparison with iterative reconstruction at standard doses, but very small or low-density lesions may appear less visible at lower dose levels.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansPhantoms, ImagingBone and bonesDeep-learningThoraxTomography (x-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID42720870
PMCPMC13562475

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.