ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Tract de-epithelialization with internal orifice closure: a sphincter-sparing fistula-in-ano repair: DOCS-FR.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cryptoglandular perianal fistula is a common condition that negatively affects patients' quality of life and can potentially lead to life-threatening perianal sepsis. In the specific case of. the inter- or trans-sphincteric variants, the risk of incontinence remains a concern. The aim of the present technical note is to describe a surgical technique aimed at: (1) De-epithelializing the fistula tract with a stainless-steel wire rope guided helical curettage; (2) Excising the fistula external orifice; (3) Suture closing the fistula internal orifice thereby isolating the de-epithelialized tract; (4) Leaving the sphincter alone. The main advantages of the present technique include potentially more definitive benefits compared with seton placement, applicability in patients not suitable for fistulotomy due to risk of incontinence, low cost, and ease of implementation in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42720901What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.