ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Self-Reported Knowledge, Attitudes, Perceptions, and Readiness Regarding AI Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Trainees: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: AI technologies refer to computer-based systems designed to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence and have been increasingly used in obstetrics and gynecology (O&G). Objective: This study aimed to assess O&G trainees' self-reported knowledge of AI, attitude toward its introduction into clinical practice, perception of its clinical importance, and their readiness for its introduction. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024, among O&G trainees in Jordan. Data were collected on participants' characteristics, self-reported knowledge of AI in O&G, their attitudes toward its introduction, and perception of its importance. The scores of the 3 domains and the study-specific knowledge, attitude, and perception (KAP)-based readiness were converted into percentages of their maximum attainable scores and were grouped into low, moderate, and high categories. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with KAP-based readiness. Results: A total of 218 trainees were recruited; the median age was 28 (IQR 24-38) years, 180 (82%) participants were female, 117 (53.7%) were junior trainees, 148 (67.9%) were working in public hospitals, 183 (83.9%) reported "average or better" knowledge of IT, and 196 (89.9%) had never received formal training on the medical applications of AI. The highest median percentage score was for self-reported knowledge (71.1%, IQR 62.2%-75.6%). Additionally, KAP-based readiness was moderate in 188 (86.2%) participants. In multivariable linear regression, none of the examined trainee characteristics were independently associated with the KAP-based readiness (all Conclusions: O&G trainees in Jordan demonstrated moderate self-reported knowledge of AI, generally positive attitudes and perceptions of its importance, and moderate study-specific KAP-based readiness. Moreover, formal training on AI medical applications was uncommon, and most trainees supported the integration of AI training into medical education. These findings support the need for structured AI education, and future research should evaluate broader and objectively measured individual and organizational determinants of AI-related readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.