ArticleHealth education research2026
A content analysis of the characteristics of the popular mental health podcasts.
Article in Health education research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health challenges continue to rise in the United States, yet access to treatment remains limited. Podcasts have become an important channel for disseminating mental health information and improving mental health. Despite the proliferation of mental health podcasts, little is known about the characteristics that make certain podcasts especially popular. To address this gap, the present study conducted a comprehensive content analysis of the top 100 mental health podcasts listed in the Apple Podcasts app and guided by the PodCred Framework. Three trained coders analyzed 100 mental health podcasts. Findings revealed consistent patterns among top-ranked podcasts. Most of them maintained a strong topical focus, consistent structure, and conversational delivery style, with episodes averaging 30-60 minutes. Podcasters frequently shared personal experiences, displayed emotional expressiveness, and demonstrated professional credibility through credentials and affiliations. Content typically combined recommendations, factual information, and personal discussion, supported by high production quality and predictable release schedules. Overall, the results extend the PodCred Framework to the mental health domain and highlight key features that appear to attract and sustain listeners. These insights offer practical guidance for podcast creators and contribute to emerging scholarship on digital mental health communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.