ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2026
Crisis responders' perspectives on animal-assisted crisis response in acute trauma settings: a qualitative study.
Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAnimal-Assisted Crisis Response (AACR) is used to provide immediate psychosocial support following traumatic events, yet limited qualitative research has examined how crisis responders understand its role in acute trauma settings. This study explored responders' perspectives on the relational, emotional, and operational dimensions of AACR.
methodSemi-structured interviews and demographic questionnaires were completed with 21 crisis responders involved in acute trauma response. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis supported by ATLAS.ti.
resultsFour themes were identified. Participants described AACR as facilitating relational and non-verbal engagement, emotional regulation, grounding, and perceived safety. They also reported that AACR could influence the emotional and interpersonal dynamics of trauma scenes and support responders and bystanders. Implementation was shaped by cultural attitudes toward dogs, scene conditions, organisational requirements, handler preparedness, and animal welfare considerations.
conclusionsThe findings provide qualitative insight into how crisis responders perceive AACR within acute trauma settings. AACR was described as a potentially valuable component of psychosocial crisis response, particularly when verbal engagement is difficult. Further research should examine survivor experiences, culturally responsive implementation, responder well-being, animal welfare, and the conditions under which AACR may be appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.